Acetabular Labral Tear (ALT)

Authors
Affiliations

Doctor of Physical Therapy

B.S. in Kinesiology

Doctor of Physical Therapy

B.A. in Neuroscience

Overview

Epidemiology

Up to 90% of patients with mechanical hip pain have acetabular labral tears1.

Etiology

Researchers have retrospectively attributed labral tears to a variety of causes. The most common theorized causes of acetabular labral tears are mechanical impingement and/or femoracetabular joint instability1. Other methods such as direct trauma, sports, and torsional or twisting hip movements have been attributed to acetabular labral tears1.

Caution

Although many potential mechanisms of injury have been cited, a large number of labral tears occur insidiously and are not associated with a specific event1.

Two common types of scenarios have been recognized:

  1. “A young person with a twisting injury to the hip, usually an external rotation force in a hyperextended position.”1
  2. “An older person with a history of hip and/or acetabular dysplasia, or the result of repeated pivoting and twisting.”1

There are a variety of etiologies of labral tears including degenerative, dysplastic, traumatic, or idiopathic1

  • Degenerative etiologies are generally associated with inflammatory arthropathies1.
  • Traumatic etiologies usually present with an immediate sharp pain along with mechanical symptoms (catching, locking, or clicking)1.
  • Insidious etiologies have a dull type pain with intermittent sharp pain caused by particular movements (typically hip IR or ER)1.

Classification

Labral tears can be classified according to:

  1. Location1
  2. Etiology1
  3. Type1

Type

Labral tears have been classified into four types:1

  1. Radial flap (the most common type)
  2. Radial fibrillated
  3. Longitudinal peripheral (least common)
  4. Abnormally mobile

Seldes’ Types

Alternatively, Seldes et al. created two classifications for acetabular labral tears based on the anatomical and histological features of the tear1.

  1. Type 1 Tears
  2. Type 2 Tears

Both type 1 and type 2 tears are “associated with chondrocyte proliferation and hyalinization of the labral fibrocartilage along the edges of the defect”1. Following a labral tear, the base of the tear adjacent to the attachment site is associated with increased microvascularity1. In addition, osteophyte formation is occassionally observed in labral tears1.

Type 1 Tears

Type 1 tears refer to an acetabular labral injury where the labrum is detached from the articular cartilage surface1. Typically, type 1 tears occur in the “transition zone” between the transition zone between the labrum and the articular hyaline cartilage1. They are perpendicular to the articular surface and, in some cases, extend to the subchondral bone1.

Type 2 Tears

Type 2 tears consist of one or more cleavage planes of variable depth within the substance of the labrum.251

Location

Acetabular labral tears have 3 main locations:

  1. Anterior
  2. Posterior
  3. Superior
Note

It should be noted that anterior and anteriorsuperior acetabular tears are the most common1.

Anterior Tear

These tears are more common with degenerative hip diseases or acetabular dysplasia1. The anterior aspect of the labrum is subjected to higher forces and therefore greater stresses compared to the other aspects of the labrum, resulting in a higher prevalence of tears1. For example, the since the acetabulum and femoral head are oriented anteriorly, the femoroacetabular joint has the least bony constraint anteriorly and thus relies on the connective tissue of the joint capsule, acetabular labrum, and ligaments to maintain stability1.

History

Mechanical symptoms

A labral lesion causes a decrease in intraarticular joint pressure1 and an increase in joint laxity1. These two femoroacetabular joint changes result in a variety of mechanical symptoms:

  • Buckling1
  • Catching1
  • Twinges1
  • Clicking1
  • Painful clicking1
  • Locking1
  • Instability1

Traumatic History

According to Dutton, acetabular labral tears may or may not include a history of trauma1. For those who have a history of trauma, the severity of the trauma to the femoroacetabular joint ranges from “very mild” to “severe”1. These femoroacetabular injuries generally involve a femoroacetabular joint stress combined with rotation1.

Pain history

Pain associated with acetabular labral tears can present in many different locations:

  • Anterior groin (most common)1
  • Lateral thigh1
  • Posterior thigh1
  • Medial knee1
Note

Pain can present in one area by itself or a combination of areas1

Pain onset can be acute and quick or gradual1.

The nature of the pain is generally “sharp” and associated with a clicking, snapping, catching or locking sensation1.

Aggravations

Movements that involve forced hip adduction with associated ER or IR generally aggravate this pain1.

Risk Factors

Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of acetabular labral tear can generally be determined based on the the history and physical examination, regardless, the diagnosis is often delayed or is often misdiagnosed1. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis if primarily due to the variable clinical presentations of labral tears1.

Physical Examination

“On examination, ROM of the hip may or may not be limited, but, in those cases where it is not limited, there may be pain at the extremes.25 There is little information regarding the sensitivity, specificity, or likelihood ratios associated with a single clinical test or a cluster of tests in diagnosing a labral tear.176 Generally speaking, the combined movement of flexion and rotation causes pain in the groin. More precisely, the specific maneuvers that may cause pain in the groin include”

Flex + ADD + IR

flexion, adduction, and internal rotation of the hip joint (impingement test/scour test) while it is held in at least 90 degrees of flexion and at least 15 degrees of abduction—positive with anterior—superior tears, anterior labral tears, and iliopsoas tendinopathy

Passive hEXT + ABD + ER

passive hyperextension, abduction, and external rotation (with posterior tears), with the patient lying supine at the edge of the table; a positive finding with this test is apprehension or exquisite pain and suggests anterior hip instability, an anterior labral tear, or posteroinferior impingement

Resisted SLR

resisted straight-leg raise test

Flex ER max ABD to Ext Abd IR

flexion of the hip with external rotation and full abduction, followed by extension, abduction, and internal rotation (anterior tears)

Ext ABD ER to Flex ADD IR

extension, abduction, and external rotation brought to a flexed, adducted, and internally rotated position (posterior tears).

Clinical pearl

Hip internal rotation with overpressure and the FABER test have been shown to demonstrate the highest sensitivity, compared to the resisted straight leg raise and scour test in identifying intra-articular hip pain.1791

Provocative tests

  • Scour Test2
  • Internal Rotation Over Pressure (IROP)2
  • Posterior Impingement Test2
  • FABER Test2
  • Stinchfield Test2
  • Thomas Test2
    • Thomas test can be positive for labral pathology when a click is palpated or pain is elicited2

Signs & symptoms

  • Strength deficits are not a consistent symptom of Acetabular labral tears1.

The following combination of symptoms are more reliable and increase the likelihood of a patient having an acetabular labral tear.

  • No restrictions in ROM1
  • Normal radiographs1
  • Complaints of a long duration involving anterior hip or groin pain and clicking1
  • Pain with passive hip flexion combined with adduction and internal rotation1
  • Pain with an active straight-leg raise1

Diagnosis

Acetabular labreal tear diagnosis is primarily confirmed using MRA, MRI, and intra-articular anesthetic injections1.

“A diagnostic intra-articular hip injection was used as the gold standard to confirm the presence of intra-articular hip pathology (IAHP), as a positive diagnostic block has been shown to be 90% accurate in detection of hip internal derangement and a good predictor of improvement after surgical intervention”3

Management

Physical Therapy

Traditional Conservative management
  • Bed rest1
  • Potentially traction1
  • A period of protected weight bearing1
  • Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication1

Lewis and Sahrmann44 recommend the use of key elements of the examination to develop a plan of intervention (Table 19-18). Operative treatment has traditionally consisted of arthrotomy or arthroscopy with resection of the entire labrum or the portion of the labrum that is torn. Labral reconstruction is a newer technique that has gained popularity and has had good short-term results; however, the indications for this procedure are continuing to be refined.162

See table 19-181 to see the sahrmann treatment approach

Post-operative POC

Postoperatively, the protocol can be divided into three phases174,180: Phase 1 (days 1–7): ▶ Weight bearing to tolerance with crutches. ▶ Isometric quadriceps, gluteal sets. ▶ AROM in all planes of motion. ▶ Closed-chain bridging, weight shifts, and balancing exercise. ▶ Open-chain standing abduction, adduction, flexion, and extension with no resistance. ▶ Avoidance of straight-leg raise exercises. Phase 2 (weeks 2–3): ▶ Progress off crutches and normalize gait. ▶ Progress ROM exercises to gradual end-range stretch within tolerance. ▶ Stationary bike, if tolerated. ▶ Open-chain above the knee-resistive Theraband or light pulley exercises. Phase 3 (weeks 4–6): ▶ Continue flexibility exercises. ▶ Progress resisted strengthening and closed-chain exercises. Emphasis is placed on hip and lumbopelvic stabilization, correction of hip muscular imbalance, and biomechanical control.181 ▶ Functional, and sport-specific functional, activities introduced as tolerated.1

References

1.
Dutton M. Dutton’s Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 5th ed. McGraw Hill Education; 2020.
2.
Wong SE, Cogan CJ, Zhang AL. Physical Examination of the Hip: Assessment of Femoroacetabular Impingement, Labral Pathology, and Microinstability. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2022;15(2):38-52. doi:10.1007/s12178-022-09745-8
3.
Maslowski E, Sullivan W, Forster Harwood J, et al. The diagnostic validity of hip provocation maneuvers to detect intra-articular hip pathology. PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 2010;2(3):174-181. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.01.014

Citation

For attribution, please cite this work as: